Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:27:55 -0800 From: "Andras Kende" <andras@kende.com> To: "'Marc G. Fournier'" <scrappy@hub.org>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU Message-ID: <000801c6165f$06475480$0a01a8c0@a> In-Reply-To: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:52 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I think HyperThreading is more like 2 Logical CPU Maybe some details here: http://www.short-media.com/review.php?r=261 Best regards, Andras Kende http://www.kende.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801c6165f$06475480$0a01a8c0>