From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 19:51:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 05D2D106566C; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:51:28 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110813195127.GA34295@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [rfc] replacing /boot/kernel.old with a unique directory name X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:51:28 -0000 hi there, i just had the following idea: how about instead of copying the current kernel to /boot/kernel.old and then installing the new one under /boot/kernel as the results of target installkernel, we create a unique directory name for the old kernel? something like /boot/kernel-r${revision}-${/dev/random}? that would let people not only boot the previous kernel, but all kernels that have been replaced by target installkernel. this would make tracking issues, which have been introduced by a certain commit much easier, imho. i don't think implementing this logic would be that difficult. the only problem i see is with ${/dev/random} in the case where people are running a kernel without /dev/{u}random support. cheers. alex