From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 04:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2AB16A4CE; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7594F43D3F; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 276C414738; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:20:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:20:07 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Eivind Eklund In-Reply-To: <20040312112232.GB5000@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Mark Linimon cc: docs@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-developers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] document procedure to add a new ports category to Committer's Guide X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:20:07 -0000 > Can't we just have people fix this directly for the usual case, and have > a "submit a doc PR if you feel uncomfortable about doing that" as an > option? I don't really have a problem with this. I note, however, that recently the doc guys have taken a few "arrows in the back" as we say colloquially here, from ports committers, in terms of checkins to the handbooks that weren't 100%. Basically common sense and courtesy ought to be the determinants. I'll accept any rewording. I'm far more interested in getting a complete list of the things that need to be changed, than in promulgating procedures. mcl