From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 21:48:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F1916A469 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5530513C469 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A99EEBC3B; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:48:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:48:14 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: robert@webtent.com Message-Id: <20080117164814.e1c7a086.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1200605937.7281.79.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <1200605937.7281.79.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Fitzpatrick , Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: db performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:48:16 -0000 In response to Robert Fitzpatrick : > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:19 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > > real memory = 3220635648 (3071 MB) > > > avail memory = 3150565376 (3004 MB) > > > > > > we have 3GB of RAM available with actually 4GB physical RAM installed? > > > > If you're using a 32-bit (i386) kernel you need PAE. Or switch to 64-bit > > (amd64). > > Yes, this is something else I've found I need to do to these i386 > servers since we upgraded the memory, I guess I'll get PAE in the kernel > and switch the RAID, should provide quite a difference, yes? Some people > have suggested the PAE drivers may not be stable with my hardware. I don't recommend PAE simply because amd64 works so well and PAE is a holdover hack. That being said, if your hardware is i386 only, you're stuck with PAE. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com