From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 14 3:29:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dns.comrax.com (dns.comrax.com [194.90.246.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED0837BE0F for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from noor@comrax.com) Received: from NOOR (unknown [156.27.243.27]) by dns.comrax.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E07541C99C for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:29:44 +0300 (IDT) From: "Noor Dawod" To: "FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List" Subject: Latest STABLE sources. Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Noor Dawod" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I've been reading last week's postings regarding STABLE sources, and I think there were few bugs in it that were found, and patched, but others still exist: 1. A compile error in make buildworld in lpcontrol. A patch was supplied. 2. An install problem in make installworld, while installing perl5. Set NO_PERL in /etc/make.conf to install correctly. 3. I believe there's a problem in /etc/defaults/rc.conf as it doesn't read /etc/rc.conf correctly. I didn't find a post about this, and in my case at least, the 'defaultrouter' and 'named_enable' parameters were not recognized from /etc/rc.conf by /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Is this known? That's it for now... Do you guys know for sure that the current STABLE release is Ok now? Thanks, Noor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message