From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jun  4 16:13:34 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1060037B578; Sun,  4 Jun 2000 16:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de)
Received: from bigeye.mips.inka.de (uucp@)
	by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp 
	id 12yjaA-0004oR-00; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 01:13:26 +0200
Received: (from naddy@localhost)
	by bigeye.mips.inka.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA05329;
	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 00:56:40 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from naddy)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 00:56:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Message-Id: <200006042256.AAA05329@bigeye.mips.inka.de>
To: jonathan@fosburgh.org
Subject: Re: ports/18989: ksh93 port marked BROKEN due to missing distfile, which is still avail.
X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd.ports
In-Reply-To: <20000603192937.0BDA837B5F0@hub.freebsd.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gnats@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <20000603192937.0BDA837B5F0@hub.freebsd.org> you write:

> >Number:         18989
> >Category:       ports
> >Synopsis:       ksh93 port marked BROKEN due to missing distfile, which
> is still avail.

> ports/ksh93 is marked as BROKEN "Binary distribution no longer available" 
> even though the distfile is still available from
> www.research.att.com/sw/tools/reuse
> under the original conditions.

Apparently this is correct.
(Maybe it is available again? I don't recall the exact circumstances
from when I disabled the port.)

> >Fix:
> Remove the BROKEN tag from the Makefile.

As maintainer of the port, I agree.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message