From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 8 13:03:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E2616A41C for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from liberty.onthenet.com.au (liberty.OntheNet.com.au [203.22.124.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB8A43D45 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from [203.144.2.137] (CPE-2-137.dsl.OntheNet.net [203.144.2.137]) by liberty.onthenet.com.au (8.12.9 - 20030918/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j68D377v085361; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 23:03:08 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <42CE7984.5060306@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:03:00 +1000 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org References: <20050705163155.GA18493@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> <42CB0C67.7030705@freebsd.org> <20050706011247.GA20055@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> <42CB3243.2010804@freebsd.org> <20050706221854.GA23695@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> <42CC6180.3090102@freebsd.org> <20050708123053.GA30311@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050708123053.GA30311@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mac Mini and Xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:03:14 -0000 Hi Sean, > Has anyone been compiling on the mini itself? I keep getting a memory > error as below: .. > # swapinfo > Device 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/ad0s11 1008320 0 1008320 0% > # > > Why is it complaining about allocating 256K (interesting given the > fact that the machine has 256MB of RAM)? As you can see above, > swap isn't even used. > > Did I just get a bad checkout? I've been cross-building fine on x86 so I don't think there's any issue with the source tree. Would you be able to run 'top' during the build and see if memory is heading toward being exhausted (or running into swap) ? My 512M mini is finally powered up so I'll try a build on that (limiting mem to 256M with hw.physmem). later, Peter.