From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 31 14:21:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4442F8
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59518E8
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9VELX9Y015531
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193588] [PATCH] Staged malo(4) firmware module
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-193588-13-RczVvQsbyr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193588-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193588-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:34 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193588

--- Comment #10 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
yes, it helps.

If I understand this correctly, the original port is in the link mentioned in
in the description, and the attachments are patches to that link.

Needless to that, that is less than optimal (read unacceptable).

A new port needs to be introduced with a shar file: 
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html

Before this port can advance, I'd like to see a completely up-to-date shar file
submitted and all the other patches made obsolete.   We also need poudriere
logs with stage-qa checks (testport, bulk -t) as a second attachment, at the
very least.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.