From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 15:53:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663BE1065673 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247B58FC08 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QaVAy-0002pz-7P>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:53:40 +0200 Received: from e178028147.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.28.147] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QaVAy-00063A-4l>; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:53:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4E060484.5050905@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:53:40 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110622 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Divacky References: <4E059500.40107@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110625081056.GA28892@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110625081056.GA28892@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.28.147 Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: LLVM: llvm-as, llvm-ld and so on not contained in FreeBSD core contrib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:53:41 -0000 On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Hello. >> Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils >> from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm >> collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution. > > There's no use for these utilities in FreeBSD base system. > >> I build FreeBSD 9 with CLANG. But as a missing llvm-as and llvm-ld (or >> llvm-ar) would imply, the binaries are generated via binutils from >> theGNU suite, aren't they? > llvm-{as,ld,ar} are not replacements for those from binutils. llvm-* > work on the llvm bitcode only and are of no use for normal object > files. > > dim@ made a patch that adds those utilities if you really need them > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2011-June/000216.html > > By default when you compile things with clang it uses its own assembler > (ie. it goes directly from C -> .o) so typically only gnu ld is used > in the compilation chain. > > > roman Thank you very much. Patched and works. Oliver