From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 18 16:22: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEEB37B718; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:22:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA79853; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 01:21:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Bruce Evans Cc: David Malone , current@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, jake@FreeBSD.ORG, Ian Dowse Subject: Re: Interesting backtrace... References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Mar 2001 01:21:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "19 Mar 2001 01:15:40 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly: I mean npx.c. I'll commit the fix in a second. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message