From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 21:29:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E6016A4CE; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:29:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx3.compete.com (cmpt-hq.compete.com [208.20.156.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBD943D4C; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rkramer@compete.com) Received: from winops03.win.compete.com (winops03.win.compete.com.127.5.10.in-addr.arpa [10.5.127.44] (may be forged)) by mx3.compete.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0ELTGeO000910; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:29:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from 10.5.127.170 ([10.5.127.170]) by winops03.win.compete.com ([10.5.127.44]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:28:03 +0000 Received: from slappy by winops03.win.compete.com; 14 Jan 2005 16:29:15 -0500 From: Ross Kramer To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200501141522.57653.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <1105725440.11715.33.camel@slappy> <1105733420.11715.48.camel@slappy> <200501141522.57653.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:29:15 -0500 Message-Id: <1105738155.11715.52.camel@slappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 (2.0.3-2) cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: em0 issues with 4.10 + SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:29:19 -0000 Actually, I did try it with 4.11-RC2. I was still getting the same problem. If it's a driver issue, why does it work with SMP disabled? On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 15:22 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 14 January 2005 03:10 pm, Ross Kramer wrote: > > Well, I am running a number of 4.9-RELEASE systems with dual onboard > > intel Pro 1000s (em0 and em1) and SMP, and they don't seem to have any > > problems. At this point, I am completely baffled. Does 5.x come with an > > SMP generic kernel? > > Ok, then it sounds like it might be a driver issue in em(4). Have you tried > using the 4.11 release candidate 2? (4.11-RC2) to see if it has been fixed > after 4.10? > ____________________________ # Ross Kramer # # Systems Administrator # # Compete, Inc. # # rkramer@compete.com # #__________________________# Random quote: "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." --D. Adams