From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Apr 19 14:43:26 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA00440 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:43:26 -0700 Received: from edcom.com (edcom.com [140.174.173.185]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA00434 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:43:24 -0700 Received: (from edward@localhost) by edcom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA00540; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:42:58 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 14:42:58 -0700 From: Edward Wang Message-Id: <199504192142.OAA00540@edcom.com> To: ache@astral.msk.su, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Subject: Re: bin/351: long mail messages overflow line-count field Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > [copying source from Vangogh is a bad idea ...] No problem. I don't want to do anything that gets anyone in trouble. For the bug report in question, the fix is two lines in one file, and I wrote it myself. So, let me just reproduce it here and give you the diff. I'll also take a look at what else is new in mail and whether any of it is useful. *** /usr/src/usr.bin/mail/def.h Fri May 27 05:32:06 1994 --- def.h Tue Oct 25 16:36:49 1994 *************** *** 68,77 **** struct message { short m_flag; /* flags, see below */ - short m_block; /* block number of this message */ short m_offset; /* offset in block of message */ long m_size; /* Bytes in the message */ ! short m_lines; /* Lines in the message */ }; /* --- 68,77 ---- struct message { short m_flag; /* flags, see below */ short m_offset; /* offset in block of message */ + long m_block; /* block number of this message */ long m_size; /* Bytes in the message */ ! long m_lines; /* Lines in the message */ }; /*