From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 12:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: vbox@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB44B243 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13E52DE9 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rADCe1P2071374 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rADCe13k071373; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201311131240.rADCe13k071373@freefall.freebsd.org> To: vbox@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= Subject: Re: ports/182468: [patch] lang/gcc builds unrunnable emulators/virtualbox-ose X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:07:57 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/182468; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, peter@rulingia.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/182468: [patch] lang/gcc builds unrunnable emulators/virtualbox-ose Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:31:49 +0100 I think the idea and approach is correct but I went for a slighly more conservative approach if _GCC_RUNTIME was not set which is true in case base gcc is used= . http://redports.org/changeset/19591 --=20 Bernhard Fr=F6hlich http://www.bluelife.at/