From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 2 4:40: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A6F37BBFD for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 04:40:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pherman@frenchfries.net) Received: from bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de (dial-195-14-233-140.netcologne.de [195.14.233.140]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05913 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:40:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost.security.at12.de [127.0.0.1]) by bagabeedaboo.security.at12.de (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e62Bdhv10418 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:39:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:39:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul Herman To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vmstats for pages that go inactive->active In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, I wrote: > vmmeter->cnt.v_reactivated counts the number of cache pages that get > promoted to either active or inactive queues. My read (and I could be > wrong) from vm/vm_page.c is, there is no statistic to count the > inactive pages that get "reclaimed" into the active queue. Another idea would be to simply include the number of reclaimed inactive pages into the original cnt.v_reactivated stats, since they are in this sense basically the same as reclaimed cache pages. Thoughts? -Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message