From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 18 16:13:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E82E38 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abgupta@microsoft.com) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0237.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5350124AA for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.144) by BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:12:56 +0000 Received: from BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.85]) by BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.151]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.005; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:12:56 +0000 From: "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" To: Karl Pielorz , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues? Thread-Topic: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues? Thread-Index: AQHOtGyZ0FLUQhf3cEaI3XfbmUZ1CpnLi5tFgAAHCYCAAADwlYAAEuoAgAAEcqU= Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:12:55 +0000 Message-ID: <8a1d24137e5d4d9e87212cbcf655fc76@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <18D121A056145C32F0501114@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <155969fa70a34e41a84649bf3cb81c21@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> ,<4787C47D82401721B4C53B49@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <9cabc6fbba754dd3aa357943ef82db22@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <61A92208F36F7F74F8D856F1@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <61A92208F36F7F74F8D856F1@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [71.227.189.27] x-forefront-prvs: 09730BD177 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(377454003)(52604005)(199002)(24454002)(43784003)(189002)(74706001)(47736001)(46102001)(47976001)(49866001)(74876001)(33646001)(50986001)(81816001)(69226001)(4396001)(19580405001)(80976001)(65816001)(83322001)(19580395003)(81686001)(53806001)(66066001)(54356001)(74316001)(81342001)(74662001)(74366001)(81542001)(63696002)(56816003)(77096001)(76786001)(76796001)(74502001)(76576001)(80022001)(76482001)(56776001)(47446002)(51856001)(83072001)(54316002)(59766001)(31966008)(79102001)(77982001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB210; H:BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:71.227.189.27; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:13:05 -0000 Great! Thanks for verifying!=0A= Abhishek=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: Karl Pielorz =0A= Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:56 AM=0A= To: Abhishek Gupta (LIS); freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org=0A= Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issue= s?=0A= =0A= --On 18 September 2013 14:50 +0000 "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)"=0A= wrote:=0A= =0A= > Thanks again Karl! Yes, it should work. My understanding is that the=0A= > failover should be agnostic to the guest OS but there could be some=0A= > integration component that we might have missed. So it would be good to= =0A= > get to the bottom of this.=0A= =0A= Ok, I've repeated the test twice now - and it's succeeded both times, so it= =0A= looks likely the Synology patch did 'something' that had a knock on effect= =0A= for this.=0A= =0A= fwiw/incase anyone else hit this - our test setup comprises of a pair of=0A= D412+ NAS's (active/passive) and they're now running DSM v4.3-3776-1 (which= =0A= was apparently released in the last few days) - so far (fingers crossed)=0A= this appears to be working for us now.=0A= =0A= I'll be re-testing it probably multiple times over the next few days - if I= =0A= hit any other issues - I'll let you know, and thanks again,=0A= =0A= Regards,=0A= =0A= -Karl=0A=