From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 22 13:05:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3291416A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:05:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bremen.shuttle.de (bremen.shuttle.de [194.95.249.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F071A43D45 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from schweikh@schweikhardt.net) Received: by bremen.shuttle.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 114B43B8BB; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:05:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from hal9000.schweikhardt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j0MCZOMc005387; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:35:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from schweikh@hal9000.schweikhardt.net) Received: (from schweikh@localhost) by hal9000.schweikhardt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0MCZOBl005386; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:35:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from schweikh) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:35:24 +0100 From: Jens Schweikhardt To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050122123524.GA1951@schweikhardt.net> References: <30924.1106323869@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <30924.1106323869@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anybody involved with ISO C standardization ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:05:32 -0000 On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:11:09PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: # # I just read another brain-dead proposal for a new timeformat # which appearantly is in the ISO C queue and I would really # like if we can avoid having another damn mistake in that area. # (http://david.tribble.com/text/c0xlongtime.html) # # If we have anybody who's actively involved in the ISO C standardization # who are willing to push and champion a a proposal that makes sense # then I would love to hear from them. Tribble et al are active on comp.std.c, where this discussion would have more (THE!) visibility among the powers that influcence the C standard. Did you discuss the issues with Tribble? He appears to be a reasonable guy. Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)