Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:35:48 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is em endian-clean? Message-ID: <b1fa29170705212335n9c5545fq971702583dec0a70@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170705212059q5895428dk6c4946d4bf47192d@mail.gmail.com> References: <b1fa29170705212059q5895428dk6c4946d4bf47192d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/21/07, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jack -
> I believe I've fixed the sun4v breakage caused by the interrupt filter
> changes but it appears that em still isn't working. Does Intel test at
> all on big endian hardware? If not, what do you do to avoid breaking
> e1000 on Linux?
I've confirmed that dual-endian support was broken by the recent
import. A sun4v kernel from today built with the em driver sources
from May 1st works.
-Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170705212335n9c5545fq971702583dec0a70>