From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 5 08:17:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C20916A4CE; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:17:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C6B43D2D; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:17:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1])i958HA849566; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:17:11 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20041005001557.M85445@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <20041004223818.I85445@ync.qbhto.arg> <20041005161202V.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20041005001557.M85445@ync.qbhto.arg> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 Emacs/21.3 X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20040704(IM147) Lines: 28 From: Makoto Matsushita To: DougB@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:17:06 +0900 Message-Id: <20041005171706T.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> cc: cswiger@mac.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New BIND 9 chroot directories X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:17:17 -0000 DougB> Well, I'm sorry to say that I know of no way that we can fix DougB> this problem. I'm certainly not going to try to re-engineer DougB> something so that some users can avoid feeling a pressure that DougB> doesn't really exist. :) No problem :) DougB> In the defaults don't work for you, you should edit DougB> /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist. That's why we give you the bits to DougB> play with. Ah, that's right. My solid-state brain cannot imagine that I can tweak /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist file until you mentioned. Thank you so much. DougB> I'm sorry to say, that this idea is not suitable. (...) DougB> In short, the defaults work, and do nothing to prevent users DougB> from doing other things. Hmm, it sounds reasonable, I'm happily accept current 6-current setup. Again, thank you for taking the time. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita