From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 16 4:35:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98CCC37B69F for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19029 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jan 2001 12:35:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2001 12:35:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3A643FF4.1B3CEAB2@urx.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:35:00 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Yoo Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.2-STABLE = 4.2-RELEASE? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Danny Yoo wrote: > > I wasn't able to get into the ports collection on my 4.2-STABLE box through > sysinstall until I changed one of the options to 4.2-RELEASE. Is there a > difference? I upgraded recently (a few days ago) from 4.1. Which is more > recent, STABLE or RELEASE? Neither, the only real tag for ports is "." or -current. Kent > > Thanks, > > Danny > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message