From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 13:02:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0325A106564A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD228FC1D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E84267C2C2; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:06:53 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLNm4fLvbgqS; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:06:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.6.15] (dhcp64-134-70-150.ssaf.orl.wayport.net [64.134.70.150]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B5BE267C2C1; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:06:40 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <201106231256.p5NCuPir065833@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:02:12 -0400 Message-Id: <362B3197-C172-4FA0-B15F-0F14FC56B90A@d3photography.com> References: <201106231256.p5NCuPir065833@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: Robert Bonomi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla retires Firefox 4 from security support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:02:29 -0000 On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> Jerry writes: >>>> From URL: >>> >> _4_from_security_support>. >>> >>> Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to update to >>> version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes me is how >>> quick support was pulled from version 4. >> >> My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a year. > > Quoting Maxwell Smart: "Would you believe...." > > THREE months ago. > > "current release" is 4.0.1 I'm just as confused by this...