From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 26 22:39:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 33BE316A4CF; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F06743D3F; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i9QMdKg7019746;	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:20 GMT
	(envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9QMdKM9019742;
	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:20 GMT
	(envelope-from pav)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:20 GMT
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200410262239.i9QMdKM9019742@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: pyzmen@kam.pl, pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org,
	pav@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/73115: New (update) port: polish/sms2 (2.0.0-release)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:39:21 -0000

Synopsis: New (update) port: polish/sms2 (2.0.0-release)

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: pav
State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 26 22:38:46 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
Must this be a new port? Would updateing polish/sms to 2.0.0
work better? I think it's same software and there's no point
in leaving 1.9.2 around, right?


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav
Responsible-Changed-By: pav
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 26 22:38:46 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Asked some questions.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=73115