From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 04:56:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8511F37B401 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.attbi.com (rwcrmhc11.attbi.com [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46EB43F85 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:56:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003060411562401300smg8oe>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:56:24 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h54BuNhR002837; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 07:56:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h54BuN1c002834; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 07:56:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: Jimi Thompson References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jun 2003 07:56:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44of1ejbtk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calcru negative time error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:56:25 -0000 Jimi Thompson writes: > That web page said to enter this command (which I do not have a good > understanding of but did anyway) > > # sysctl -w kern.timecounter.method=1 > > which I did, but apparently my 5.0 doesn't like that because it > promptly spit back: > > sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.timecounter.method' Does 5.0 *have* that sysctl? "sysctl kern.timecounter.method" will tell you. The handbook is still primarily oriented toward 4.x, because 5.x isn't officially ready for production use yet.