From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 29 13:11:43 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA00341 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:11:43 -0700 Received: from mail.nyc.pipeline.com (root@mail.nyc.pipeline.com [198.80.32.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA00327 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 13:11:39 -0700 Received: from pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com (pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com [198.80.32.46]) by mail.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA03528; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:11:43 -0400 Received: (axon@localhost) by pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id QAA28063; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:11:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 16:11:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Amir Y. Rosenblatt" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: A moment in the life of ftp.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <8554.812400870@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 29 Sep 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > As a periodic reminder of what FreeBSD is doing on ftp.cdrom.com, I > thought I'd paste in the first page of the `top' listing I just ran > now.. Wow. In evangelizing FreeBSD to the folks I woprk with (who just today announced their web site, which is running on a Sparc Classic), I forwarded this to them -- they were very impressed, needless to say. They want to know the config of the machine (RAM, how much diskspace, what kinda disks [i.e. regular scsi2, RAID5, etc), etc... Would it be possible to get some of this info? -Amir > > load averages: 21.41, 20.54, 18.44 11:44:00 > 499 processes: 20 running, 472 sleeping, 7 zombie > Cpu states: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle > Memory: 71M Active, 25M Inact, 16M Wired, 2476K Cache, 180K Free > Swap: 819M Total, 670M Free, 18% Inuse > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 18896 root 85 0 684K 584K run 0:33 4.20% 4.20% compress > 14212 root 86 0 568K 332K run 2:12 4.33% 4.16% gzip > 1449 root 85 0 568K 332K run 6:51 4.16% 4.16% gzip > 13231 root 85 0 568K 332K run 2:30 4.16% 4.16% gzip > 8302 root 85 0 568K 328K run 2:21 3.74% 3.74% gzip > 11383 root 2 0 98M 12M sleep 15:04 3.09% 3.09% perl > 84 root 2 0 180K 136K sleep 318:39 2.71% 2.71% syslogd > 17093 root 2 0 664K 320K sleep 0:16 1.94% 1.60% ftpd > 99 root 2 0 232K 12K run 39:56 1.60% 1.60% nfsd > 17553 www 2 0 436K 480K sleep 0:04 1.45% 1.45% httpd > 20782 root 2 0 624K 232K sleep 0:00 0.99% 0.80% ftpd > 18066 www 2 0 472K 504K sleep 0:05 0.72% 0.72% httpd > 2316 root 89 4 728K 480K run 16:55 0.72% 0.72% compress > 20850 root 2 0 616K 368K sleep 0:00 2.08% 0.69% ftpd > 19913 www 2 0 412K 412K sleep 0:02 0.65% 0.65% httpd > > Whoa, momma! Check out the size of that PERL mirror job! :-) > > I realize that this is highly subjective data given that no two ftp > servers are alike, but it's an interesting datapoint nonetheless and I > thought that it might be of interest to those of you out there who are > looking for comparison data. > > The machine remains more than reasonably interactive and I wouldn't be > at all adverse to using it as a general user if I didn't have a > perfectly good FreeBSD machine sitting next to my own desk. With 350 > ftp users logged in along with 7 interactive users (one of whom > appears to be running emacs :-), 31 active HTTP sessions and some > 700K/sec streaming constantly out of its one ethernet interface (as > checked with netstat), well, all I can say is: "This is a PC??!" :-) > > The irony is that if we could only fit more than 128MB of memory into > this beast we could do even more.. I wonder if anyone from Intel is > listening? Guys! We need a decent motherboard with room for more > memory, please! please! :-) > > Jordan > /\ Set the controls for the heart of the sun. -Pink Floyd ______/ \ ___________ __ __ _ _ _ _ . . . amir@neuron.net \ / \/ For PGP 2.6 key send mail with subject: SEND PGPKEY