From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 31 20:42:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57678106566B for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC308FC15 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86014B98B; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:42:52 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:39:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <0974E59F-62DA-407A-99A7-6704A70D12C6@airwired.net> <20120724102601.GU2676@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207311639.29970.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:42:52 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , Dan Allen Subject: Re: local APIC error 0x40 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:42:53 -0000 On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:32:45 pm Dan Allen wrote: > > On 24 Jul 2012, at 4:26 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Does your system slows down with these messages ? 0x40 means that some > > code tried to send IPI with interrupt number from the range of assigned > > CPU faults. I believe that FreeBSD code never does that. > > So, I reverted to > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v 1.688.2.31 2012/06/13 15:25:52 jhb Exp $ > > and rebuilt the kernel. By making that one change my fan problem is fixed! No more 0x40 msgs, although I only have 1 core again due to my use of hint.apic.0.disabled="1" in /boot/loader.conf. So to be clear, does that revision work fine, it's a future revision that breaks things, or does that revision break? -- John Baldwin