From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 6 14:36:51 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 14:36:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE95737B401; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678A589D; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:36:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from cup.hp.com (p1000180.nsr.hp.com [15.109.0.180]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id OAA07831; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:36:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: marcel@cup.hp.com Message-ID: <3A2EBF6B.90BA100B@cup.hp.com> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:36:27 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Somers Cc: Daniel Eischen , Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system References: <200012062200.eB6M01t07697@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers wrote: > > I've already cast my vote, and can't see any strong argument not to > remove NOLIBC_R (especially now that it breaks world :-) I think Daniel just gave a good reason: we may need it in the future. Isn't it better at this time to keep the NOLIBC_R, but to promote it to an internal tweak? -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message