From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 19 12:06:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EE216A4CE
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A798143DA0
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:05:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0JK5kCf098297;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:05:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:02:28 EST."
             <200401192002.i0JK2SJZ058752@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:05:46 +0100
Message-ID: <98296.1074542746@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Multihomed UDP server 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:06:44 -0000

In message <200401192002.i0JK2SJZ058752@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman
 writes:
><<On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:58:00 +0100, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> said:
>
>> I'm considering ways to make sendmsg(2)/recvmsg(2) DTRT, and my
>> current candidate is give them a flag bit which says "msg_name has
>> both addresses".
>
>Um, they already do the right thing.  That's what the IP_RECVDESTADDR
>option (and its dual whose name I forget right now) is all about.

Yeah, I found that out.  Now, where on the earth is that documented ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.