Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:05:46 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multihomed UDP server Message-ID: <98296.1074542746@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:02:28 EST." <200401192002.i0JK2SJZ058752@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200401192002.i0JK2SJZ058752@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman writes: ><<On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:58:00 +0100, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> said: > >> I'm considering ways to make sendmsg(2)/recvmsg(2) DTRT, and my >> current candidate is give them a flag bit which says "msg_name has >> both addresses". > >Um, they already do the right thing. That's what the IP_RECVDESTADDR >option (and its dual whose name I forget right now) is all about. Yeah, I found that out. Now, where on the earth is that documented ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?98296.1074542746>