Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 06:03:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: eischen@vigrid.com, tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Message-ID: <199907151003.GAA09860@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes: > > > There are some bugs in libc_r in stable that have been fixed in > > -current. I think the one that you've hit is an uninitialized > > TAILQ_HEAD in a statically declared mutex (in localtime). It's > > probably about time for a MFC. If someone wants to give me the > > go-ahead, I can do it... > > Just Do It (tm). At least you could merge the change from > > [pthread_private.h] > 1.20 Sun Jun 20 8:28:08 1999 UTC by jb > Diffs to 1.19 > In the words of the author: > > o The polling mechanism for I/O readiness was changed from > select() to poll(). In additon, a wrapped version of poll() > is now provided. > [...] > > plus the later formatting fixes. The libc_r version number was bumped in -current because of the addition of poll(). Is this allowed in -stable, or something that waits for a -RELEASE? > As an aside: some files still lack $Id$'s, and someone should > `s/REGENTS/AUTHOR/' in all the copyright statements. OK. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907151003.GAA09860>