Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 13:53:29 -0700 From: Johannes Lundberg <johalun@FreeBSD.org> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Weirdness when writing to pseudofs file Message-ID: <eb0fd852-643d-e399-2988-92de744d6e07@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2i63czMAWmnJik5=gEY=5r4YFhz084zJ8xoThR01POGhQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ec62e4d-9f93-ffe1-646c-3846c9308334@FreeBSD.org> <20190522175133.GC2748@kib.kiev.ua> <84e3001b-646d-b1d9-f206-577d63f79bf1@FreeBSD.org> <CAOtMX2i63czMAWmnJik5=gEY=5r4YFhz084zJ8xoThR01POGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/22/19 11:03 AM, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:59 AM Johannes Lundberg <johalun@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/22/19 10:51 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:36:34AM -0700, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I'm fiddling with lindebugfs, which is based on pseudofs. When writing
>>>> to a file,
>>>>
>>>> this works: # echo 1 >> /path/to/file
>>>>
>>>> but this does not: # echo 1 > /path/to/file
>>>>
>>>> "Operation not supported." is returned before the pseudofs code is even
>>>> entered.
>>>>
>>>> Is this expected behavior? (if so, why?)
>>> Does the file exist ?
>>>
>>> Pseudofs does not implement VOP_CREATE(), which is reasonable.
>> Yes, it exists and my custom write function is receiving the call for
>> ">>". (which is for example used by drm driver debugfs to do certain
>> things on demand by accepting write to a debugfs file)
> First, you need to try ktrace to see exactly which system call is not
> supported. If the problem still isn't obvious, then you can try
> dtrace to see exactly which VOP isn't suppoted. Do it like this:
>
> sudo ktrace /bin/sh -c "echo 1 > /path/to/file"
> sudo kdump
> sudo dtrace -i 'fbt:::return /arg1 == 45/ {trace(".")}' -c "/bin/sh -c
> 'echo 1 > /path/to/file/'"
>
> The dtrace command will show you which function returned EOPNOTSUPP.
> However, it will also show a lot of functions that coincidentally
> return 45 even though it's not an errno, and even functions that
> return void.
>
> -Alan
Thanks!
It seems, a single '>' will cause it to try to create the file (even
though it already exists) and that fails (kern_openat).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eb0fd852-643d-e399-2988-92de744d6e07>