From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 19 23:12:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0888137B401
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net
	[203.16.214.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EC343F3F
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from smckay@internode.on.net)
Received: from dungeon.home (ppp155.qld.padsl.internode.on.net
	[150.101.176.154])h5K6CZ7R038948;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:42:35 +0930 (CST)
Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dungeon.home (8.12.8p1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5K6CTgK005609;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:12:34 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from mckay)
Message-Id: <200306200612.h5K6CTgK005609@dungeon.home>
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
References: <200306170856.h5H8uoHh097154@grimreaper.grondar.org>
In-Reply-To: <200306170856.h5H8uoHh097154@grimreaper.grondar.org>
    from Mark Murray at "Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:56:50 +0100"
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:12:29 +1000
From: Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>
cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CTM - any users left? 
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:12:43 -0000

On Tuesday, 17th June 2003, Mark Murray wrote:

>The real datapoint I was looking for was any objections. There were some,
>mainly of the form "I use it so please keep it in base". Only one so far
>has been a "hard" objection, the rest have pretty much said "I can see why
>you want to do this" and "makes sense, cvsup(1) is not in base".

Cvsup is also the baby of one particular person, so it has a well-defined
home.  If ctm is removed from the base system, where does its source live?
Who has access to that repository?  In particular, do *I* have access to
that repository (since I occasionally work on ctm)?

If these things are more than trivial to handle then it is easier all
round to leave it where it is.  It's small, after all.

Stephen.