From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 23:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2451065670; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AE38FC0C; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so11718939ewy.19 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:37:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=z1PqBseed8c1YmsZ/bYB9EGc12/8+wS8NvImibfBllg=; b=AzXfX7p7MxnE05feY8LQCKtzXGjdixLzv/hMmgTc2LzFxAqJC6xAr3XdAODvgBvhls 9pyNLJjY2E81/wGovcOHt6uYE5CwyV4EQOJGX0e+mplrmKDOz8oF/wWKkVW8XwpVcIjP 9D/bE1r8bCC3vuPYQKUoy5M27EHeIqrOSBOik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=X6r/9Dr6OoNrFldutf+4R/pdWWIucoBnmwDfVuaHuCkIkiH6NKuEt9PuZW+jXZruBM 0a8fHx8Q7JHJFkS7wuQcMXYFvdv8+G22QMF0SoJqn6E3pqGS1/vhnjupP7c6eRSKuYAz /oQj2oJSPCkfpioWJtuiizFSTQtSmNv0E0i+M= Received: by 10.210.109.10 with SMTP id h10mr30832368ebc.110.1231544248208; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.58.4 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:37:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3cb459ed0901091537ld9858beq9a8428be9c900fab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:37:28 +0300 From: "Alexander Churanov" To: "Roman Divacky" In-Reply-To: <20090109230252.GA37323@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090108233311.GA69883@keltia.freenix.fr> <49672189.5060109@gmx.de> <20090109110508.GA12123@freebsd.org> <496751D1.20605@gmx.de> <20090109134725.GA38233@freebsd.org> <49675F04.20006@gmx.de> <3cb459ed0901091412o5861ec59web9b48d264ca053b@mail.gmail.com> <20090109222211.GA33145@freebsd.org> <3cb459ed0901091453i2144419fyede5894ae411a259@mail.gmail.com> <20090109230252.GA37323@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Andrew Reilly , Ollivier Robert , Christoph Mallon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:37:30 -0000 2009/1/10 Roman Divacky > ie. no strong need for -pedantic as far as I can tell :) > > honestly... we need some of the gnu99 features and it's only a good thing > that > the alternative compilers support that, I also have a gut feeling that (as > it > was in the past) some of the gnu99 things might appear in the next C > standard > > Well, since standards aim to document existing practice and not to invent things, your assumption sounds very reasonable. However, adoption of gcc extensions means that behavior of gcc is de-facto standard, more respected than ISO, for a group of developers. Sincerely, Alexander Churanov