From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 26 16:16:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93DF976C for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D282A4E for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id g10so7977433pdj.17 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:15:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xvF74o3Z6UXj6lb2OCReUfL14VdFay+e1y7adpaY2+4=; b=Zy1Z0TdBtHT/qU308UK6WkNqqs7ssvR0lN6omfsXK3VmB0OX1heRnZBBNoqzxHqqaB VJv/GHs3rA1X77WCSKVcx+PSl2athSAv79zYRojfOFL4Al/X5oY7rE2l7oCVYc2iCAof r1XKQF1zc9MB+gejaaftwTzkaORrHoZo2xG0JPZYybEWSF1hDZU5KpAEdGFvlniOBevE gRrAmusN2DM5UYJGZAia4HSk9fLzZbHahTYmn//ebw+y1XazhLIl3NfRXZvd4bqd5EAU 8OJgtGeDib910FsQSwReCH58CRydrGJ8JbhFQW43lMNCNgITeTVkCSSR/vZDmSzQBn1p djFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnjrB+qS+y70DpqPYwgqEyjXT2WM4kQ1Du1s1S45nLToYHGIMcI4d8BsYhfoQJTIfgsBLwn X-Received: by 10.66.122.100 with SMTP id lr4mr11262554pab.164.1385482554348; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:15:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.123] (99-74-169-43.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.74.169.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bl8sm82473323pad.17.2013.11.26.08.15.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:15:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) Subject: Re: freebsd-arm description? From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:15:40 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <7DCF72F0-4072-46DD-A3F7-F33FC10055E9@neville-neil.com> <1385414670.1220.21.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <41B13191-0D41-4EA8-BBCE-3E6A440EF90A@neville-neil.com> <47088196-D4BE-4490-A4DA-C4EF6D4A27F3@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:16:00 -0000 I=92ll follow-up with postmaster to make the change. Thanks for the suggested edits. Tim On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Ronald Klop = wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:26:02 +0100, Warner Losh = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:28 PM, George Neville-Neil wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 16:24 , Ian Lepore wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:07 -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: >>>>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 16:05 , Tim Kientzle = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> According to this page: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =93[This mailing list] is for individuals actively working on >>>>>> porting FreeBSD to the StrongArm Processor.=94 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> How do we change that to something a bit more accurate? >>>>>> (I=B4ve recently heard from someone who passed over >>>>>> this mailing list because they didn=B4t think it applied to >>>>>> more modern ARM processors.) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Maybe: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =93This is a technical mailing list for people working to >>>>>> develop and support FreeBSD on various ARM >>>>>> processors and SOCs.=94 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> +postmaster@ >>>>>=20 >>>>> I think they can do this. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Best, >>>>> George >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> It might be better to say "systems" or "computers" in place of = SOCs. >>>> Our focus historically has been on the chip/SoC, but increasingly = ARM >>>> processors are finding their way into off-the-shelf retail = computers. >>>=20 >>> I think if we leave off =93and SOCs=94 we=92ll run the correct = gamut. >>=20 >> You might want to toss 'modern' in front of the processors, since we = mostly talk about that here, with the odd question about legacy things = that have gotten broken. But I'm easy. >>=20 >> Warner >=20 > Drop the point that it is a list for people. It is about 'running = FreeBSD on ARM processors' AFAIK. >=20 > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"