From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 24 13:47:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA10871 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 13:47:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA10858 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 13:47:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA06051; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 16:45:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 16:45:28 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber Reply-To: John Fieber To: Terry Lambert cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, langfod@dihelix.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine? In-Reply-To: <199703242110.OAA23473@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > The benefit is in having a date-order stamp on message *that came > into* majordomo. Ah, I see what you are getting at. I'm wondering if it would be less hassle to simply use the Received: header that sendmail on freefall attaches automatically: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA19763 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:26:41 -0800 (PST) Stepping back a bit, for a variety of reasons, the headers need to be massaged before indexing, and that would be a prime time to extract the date from the Received line into a form more suitable for indexing and retrieval. I already do that with the Date field. -john