From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 09:01:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6338516A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from svaha.com (svaha.com [38.113.6.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039DE43D49 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:01:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (653260hfc48.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.60.48]) (AUTH: LOGIN meconlen) by svaha.com with esmtp; Thu, 27 May 2004 12:00:27 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Michael Conlen Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:00:14 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: nfsd and nfsiod X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:01:20 -0000 I've noticed nfsd.c and nfsiod.c hard code the limit of 20 processes. There's also a kernel tunable in FreeBSD 5 for maxiod IIRC. Is there a reason for this or could they be increased? -- Michael Conlen