Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:35:11 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gabor Pali <pgj@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/hs-alex Makefile Message-ID: <4A29493F.7030004@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A29485C.3060504@FreeBSD.org> References: <200906051159.n55BxGPw078489@repoman.freebsd.org> <4A29485C.3060504@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton escribió: > Gabor Pali wrote: > >> pgj 2009-06-05 11:59:16 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> devel/hs-alex Makefile >> Log: >> - Respect custom PREFIX, LOCALBASE >> - Bump port revision >> >> Reported by: QAT >> Approved by: gabor (mentor) >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.27 +7 -0 ports/devel/hs-alex/Makefile >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/hs-alex/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.26&r2=1.27&f=h >> >> > > I can't see any reason for a PORTREVISION bump here. Kudos for fixing > this issue, but if we do bumps for every time nothing but this is > fixed our users are going to be doing a lot of needless recompiles for > no benefit. > As approver, I also thought about this but some people might use a different PREFIX/LOCALBASE configuration constantly and in this case a rebuild is necessary to get this port installed correctly. I don't think using custom PREFIX/LOCALBASE is widespread but theoretically it is possible that there are such people. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A29493F.7030004>