From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 06:54:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D0E37B401; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D2543FD7; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:54:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 67F4A5309; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:54:44 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Alexander Leidinger From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:54:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030408153259.2a4b03ac.Alexander@Leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:32:59 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <20030408152227.60c38ce3.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <200304081327.h38DR9XC025406@spider.deepcore.dk> <20030408153259.2a4b03ac.Alexander@Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Soeren Schmidt cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-all.h ata-chipset.cata-dma.c ata-pci.c ata-pci.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 13:54:47 -0000 Alexander Leidinger writes: > Does this mean we can't use ATA-TQ in situations where we would use TQ > without WC on a SCSI system (read: does it affect softupdates)? Tagged queueing doesn't make sense without a write cache. Think about it for a minute. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org