From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 23:04:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494A016A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8523443FDF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:04:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vWEU-0000XO-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:07:38 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vWEU-0000WK-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:07:38 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8666Rvt078840; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:06:27 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8666RwC078817; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:06:27 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:06:27 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20030906060627.GD72373@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20030905140628.H90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030905140628.H90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: DougB@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 06:04:52 -0000 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:16:43PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Howdy, > > Seems this topic is a perennial favorite, so I'd like to establish > general agreement on a policy to deal with this going forward. I propose > the following "guidelines" for discussion: [ ... snip ... ] Count my vote in. ;-) ./danfe