From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 16 20:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F75516A479 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B3143D68 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (216-160-98-154.tukw.qwest.net [216.160.98.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5GKArpb046702 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:10:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:10:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20060616130550.E568@10.0.0.1> Message-ID: <20060616131023.B568@10.0.0.1> References: <20060616130550.E568@10.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 216.240.101.25 Cc: Subject: Re: Openoffice 2.0 build fails on current X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:10:56 -0000 10# java --version Segmentation fault (core dumped) I think this is the problem. Is java broken on 7.x? Can we get this package rebuilt? On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jeff Roberson wrote: > I get this far: > > checking the installed JDK... test: 0: unexpected operator > test: 0: unexpected operator > test: 0: unexpected operator > test: 0: unexpected operator > configure: error: JDK is too old, you need at least 1.3 > > > I have this installed: > diablo-jdk-1.5.0.06.00 Java Development Kit 1.5.0_06.00 > > Any help getting this going? > > Thanks, > Jeff >