From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Aug 2 19:46:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C22104DE92 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467479196 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6557F104DE91; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E2D104DE90 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89B579194 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7F02BA81 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w72JkorR047043 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w72JkoTF047042 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:46:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230258] [FUSE] [BUG]: Attributes caching issue Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 19:46:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 19:46:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230258 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |cem@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki from comment #4) > We've mentioned 'fuse_lowlevel_notify_inval_entry' only because it could = be > used as a work-around. We do not use this function in our current > implementation. Understood, just wanted to clarify why you saw the error message. It's interesting you mention O_APPEND. I forgot about it, but that was tot= ally broken (even on individual files) in 11.0 and I fixed it in CURRENT (r32045= 1) June 2017. It looks like MarkJ MFC'd the commit to 11 July 2017 (r320684) = and also to 11.1 (r320689). So if you are actually running 11.0 and not 11.1 p= er the PR Version field, I'd encourage you to try 11.1 :-). I can't do it now, but I'll look into the timeout value and our file size caching a little more later (maybe tonight). Thanks for the detailed report with repro, your help with investigating, an= d of course, patience. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=