From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 2 09:39:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF7ABCB3E3 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98584DCE for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68A471FE022; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:39:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: 60G+ network connection To: Slawa Olhovchenkov References: <20160901211825.GG88122@zxy.spb.ru> <0fb9979f-d479-f7b1-500e-210ed5316e0f@selasky.org> <20160902093114.GJ88122@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, Meny Yossefi , Oded Shanoon From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <224082ab-95f5-0935-6429-7e7a612f1312@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:44:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160902093114.GJ88122@zxy.spb.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 09:39:49 -0000 On 09/02/16 11:31, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:37:25AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> On 09/01/16 23:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> What hardware (NIC) recomended for 60G+ network speed? >>> >>> Chelsio limited to 54Gbit/s >>> Melanox don't available new drivers for ConnectX-5 and need too >>> expensive transmiters and connectivity. >>> Melanox don't available new drivers for ConnectX-4 Lx and also limited >>> to 54Gbit/s >>> Intel XL710 also limited to 54Gbit/s >>> >>> What I am miss? >> >> Hi, >> >> Mellanox has drivers in sys/dev/mlx5 for CX-4 which support 100GBit/s >> speeds. > > can you some clarification? > what relation between cx-4 and ConnectX®-4 Lx EN? Hi, The LX series has lower throughput and is cheaper. You'll need the regular CX-4 if you want to do 100GBit/s. Meny, correct me if I'm wrong. > Is the same? > > PS: 100G transmiters and connectiveti too expensive, 2x40G prefer. You can put 2x 40GBit/s modules in the CX-4. I'm not sure if you can combine 2x 40GBit/s into a single 80GBit/s. --HPS