From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jan 28 07:11:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA18400 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 07:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.ge.com (ns.ge.com [192.35.39.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA18379; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 07:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from thomas.ge.com (thomas.ge.com [3.47.28.21]) by ns.ge.com (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA22402; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:07:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from crissy.gemis.ge.com (crissy-ether.gemis.ge.com [3.29.7.204]) by thomas.ge.com (8.8.4/8.7.5) with SMTP id KAA24853; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:10:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from terrapin.salem.ge.com (terrapin.salem.ge.com [3.29.6.145]) by crissy.gemis.ge.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA28015; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:01:39 -0500 Received: from combs.salem.ge.com (combs.salem.ge.com [3.29.5.200]) by terrapin.salem.ge.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA01129; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:01:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by combs.salem.ge.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id KAA00635; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:01:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:01:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen F. Combs" To: Steve cc: Robert Chalmers , bsd , FreeBSD ISP , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: progress report on connection problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Xylogics Annex terminal servers running a s/w release PRIOR to 10.1 don't pass the RFC1323 and RFC 1644 stuff properly. If you set your 'tcp_extensions=NO' it should work just fine. Also tell your ISP to upgrade! I did and it works just fine! ---- Stephen F. Combs Internet: CombsSF@Salem.GE.COM GE Industrial Systems Voice: 540.387.8828 Network Services Home: CombsSF-Home@Salem.GE.COM 1501 Roanoke Blvd FAX: 540.387.7106 Salem, VA 24153 LapTop: CombsSF-Mobile@Salem.GE.COM On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Steve wrote: > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 09:03:16 -0500 (EST) > From: Steve > To: Robert Chalmers > Cc: bsd , > FreeBSD ISP , hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: progress report on connection problems > > > > > The only constant is the Annex. However, why does it pass _most_ traffic, > > if it is the fault of the Annex, and only fail on some.? > > > > If FreeBSD is > > going to be so fussy about its tcp/ip flow, shouldn't it be reworked. > > The world is still full of less than leading edge hardware! Some of it > > brand new... > > I had similar problems using annexes as term servers with user - and have > posted numerous times that this problem only exists with freebsd - sco, > linux, etc doesnt have trouble - only every time I post it I get bashed > about the head and lectured on freebsd having perfect tcp/ip and > everything else in the world having faulty tcp/ip. > > So good luck to you sir! > >