From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 09:56:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3983A16A403; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D1843D46; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:56:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k969ubPI039486; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:56:37 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k969ubF3039485; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:56:37 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:56:37 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20061006095637.GA38942@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <20061005130829.A46123@fledge.watson.org> <20061005144852.GA60575@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <200610052013.18543.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610052013.18543.jkim@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Robert Watson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:56:41 -0000 On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:13:15PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > >It's definetely a regression from 4.11-STABLE that runs fine on > > > > this system with ACPI fully enabled > > > > Hmm, I was wrong about 4.11 using ACPI - it does not use it here > > really, it uses "good old" APM. > > > > > It would be interesting to know how 4.x probes the hardware vs. > > > how it apperas in the 6.x dmesg. > > > > 4.11-STABLE: > > > > fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 > > on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold > > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > > > > 6.2-PRERELEASE: > > > > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f0 irq 6 drq 2 > > on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] > > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > > You have bad ACPI DSDT. Try newer BIOS if there's any. I've just upgraded BIOS to lastest available at support.intel.com for my motherboard (I was wrong thinking I run latest, there were more fresh). No change in behavour of fdc(4) in RELENG_6 and in HEAD, they still probe fdc0 the same way, STABLE's driver still does not work and CURRENT's works fine. Eugene Grosbein