From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  2 22:48:41 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0CB10656FB;
	Tue,  2 Jun 2009 22:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net)
Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (cl-162.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net
	[IPv6:2001:4830:1200:a1::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC038FC15;
	Tue,  2 Jun 2009 22:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net)
Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n52MmqQp019195; 
	Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:48:52 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net)
Received: (from brooks@localhost)
	by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n52MmqUL019194;
	Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:48:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:48:52 -0500
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20090602224852.GF15552@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
References: <4A257B82.1000701@FreeBSD.org>
	<EA04BF4C-AE45-4624-9C1B-152FC26405C4@verweg.com>
	<20090602205125.GA75470@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
	<20090602220624.GD15552@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
	<m2prdmnumt.wl%randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2prdmnumt.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0
	(lor.one-eyed-alien.net [127.0.0.1]);
	Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:48:52 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:48:42 -0000


--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 07:22:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need
> > to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically
> > configured to do dhcp or anything else[0].
>=20
> such as detected by services such as bind/unbound?

The rc system will do nothing with interfaces that don't pass the tests
I enumerated so if you don't have an ifconfig_<if> interface there won't
be any difference no matter how you set network_interfaces.  I'd be
rather supprised if bind did anything with interaces that weren't
configured with an address (or even up in the case of correctly
funtioning drivers).

-- Brooks

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFKJaxTXY6L6fI4GtQRAgh6AJ9zQvOVNC5NIoQAvjfljCTRAjF4+QCbBiCZ
UuhCwCv4FQm3vK9Nvh7CqDY=
=+BW4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF--