Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:37:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Helmut Schneider" <jumper99@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2.22_6 to _8 fails Message-ID: <xn0i2uh7y3j8n0003@news.gmane.org> References: <xn0i2ufez12ci0000@news.gmane.org> <504B3C22.40708@gmx.de> <xn0i2ug4q23mi8002@news.gmane.org> <504B4619.6050006@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
olli hauer wrote: > On 2012-09-08 14:57, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Hi Olli, > > > > olli hauer wrote: > > > >> On 2012-09-08 14:28, Helmut Schneider wrote: > >>> ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) -> > >>> 'apache22' (www/apache22) > >>> ---> Upgrading 'apache-2.2.22_6' to 'apache22-2.2.22_8' > >>> (www/apache22) ---> Building '/usr/ports/www/apache22' with make > >>> flags: -DWITH_PROXY -DWITH_PROXY_CONNECT -DWITH_PROXY_FTP > >>> -DWITH_PROXY_HTTP -DWITH_LDAP -DWITH_AUTHNZ_LDAP -DWITH_BDB > >>> -DWITH_APR_FROM_PORTS ===> Cleaning for apache22-2.2.22_8 > >>> ====> You must check at least one option in the PROXY multi > >>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>> The options worked fine up to 2.2.22_6 and I'm not sure how to > >>> read the error message. > > > > >> with options NG the WITH... parameters do no longer work. > >> If you want to specify them in make.conf you have to do it this way > > > > I'm using pkgtools.conf, removing -DWITH_PROXY seems to do the > > trick (I also removed the typo of DBD and the obsolete > > DWITH_APR_FROM_PORTS, but they are not related). > > > >> apache22_SET=PROXY PROXY_CONNECT PROXY_FTP ... > > > > >> The downside with options NG is if you already have an OPTIONSFILE > >> the make.conf parameters will have a lower priority. > > > > Please note this in UPDATING. > > That's not an apache limitation, it comes from options NG and is > already documented on many places and was also discussed a view times > on the list. > > Only a view interesting links > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-July/077016.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-June/076241.html Not all users can track any available resources all the time, this is what /usr/ports/UPDATING is for (IMO). Or v.v., if there was an entry in UPDATING I didn't have to ask here. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xn0i2uh7y3j8n0003>