From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Dec 21 17:30:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0F5A4EBBD; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org (repo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF861624; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.37]) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBLHTxlc034268; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:29:59 GMT (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from marino@localhost) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tBLHTxwi034267; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:29:59 GMT (envelope-from marino@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201512211729.tBLHTxwi034267@repo.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repo.freebsd.org: marino set sender to marino@FreeBSD.org using -f From: John Marino Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:29:59 +0000 (UTC) To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r404139 - head/devel/fpc-bfd X-SVN-Group: ports-head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:30:00 -0000 Author: marino Date: Mon Dec 21 17:29:59 2015 New Revision: 404139 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/404139 Log: deve/fpc-bfd: remove the useless options I just noticed this port has an "option" to use binutils, which is on by default, but turning it off would break the port. Moreover, the option makes no sense, the entire point of the port is to create an interface to libbfd. I can only imaging the option was meant to switch between the standalone libbfd and the one in devel/binutils. Let's just get rid of the whole confusing thing. devel/binutils is a hardcoded run-depends now. Modified: head/devel/fpc-bfd/Makefile Modified: head/devel/fpc-bfd/Makefile ============================================================================== --- head/devel/fpc-bfd/Makefile Mon Dec 21 17:11:29 2015 (r404138) +++ head/devel/fpc-bfd/Makefile Mon Dec 21 17:29:59 2015 (r404139) @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ # $FreeBSD$ CATEGORIES= devel lang +PORTREVISION= 2 PKGNAMESUFFIX= -bfd -PORTREVISION= 1 MAINTAINER= freebsd-fpc@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Free Pascal interface for the GNU Binary Format description @@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../lang/fpc WRKUNITDIR= ${FPCSRCDIR}/packages/${PKGNAMESUFFIX:S/-//} EXTRACTUNITDIR= ${WRKUNITDIR} -OPTIONS_DEFINE= LIBBFD -LIBBFD_DESC= Install Universal BFD library from GNU binutils -OPTIONS_DEFAULT= LIBBFD - -LIBBFD_RUN_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libbfd.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/binutils +RUN_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libbfd.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/binutils .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"