From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 30 14:54:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA07802 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:54:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA07791 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5]) by mail.cdsnet.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA26629 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:54:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:54:24 -0800 (PST) From: Jaye Mathisen To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: $confusion == CVSUP + Jaye_Mathisen Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm sorry, I'm really trying... I installed a 2.2-BETA SNAP on a box. I take the standard-supfile, set the tage to RELENG_2_2, and fire up CVSUP 14.1. It merrily cranks along, and retrieves numerous files and diffs from src-all So then I go to /usr/src, kick out a make world, and come back in a couple hours. Reboot, and voila', I still have old gook there. Like sendmail 8.8.4, which I could've sworn was updated to 8.8.5 in 2.2 several days ago. I regularly have an unbuildable /usr/src, and just renaming /usr/src to /usr/src.bak and re-cvsupping gets me a usable tree. Is it just me? Is there something obviously wrong with my procedure here? It also seems odd to me that there's a -stable branch which matches up with 2.1??? A standard branch which seems to generate a 3.0-current, and nothing in the examples that deliberately points to 2.2-nearly-released. Yet if you installed 2.2-nearly-released, you should get a cvsup file that lets you work with what you got...