From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 20 10:30:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D32616A419 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF9213C442 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6KAUAth086830 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l6KAUALw086829; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 GMT Message-Id: <200707201030.l6KAUALw086829@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Stefan Sperling Cc: Subject: Re: kern/114688: [drm] RADEON/AIGLX/DRM Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stefan Sperling List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:30:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/114688; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stefan Sperling To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, vehemens@verizon.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/114688: [drm] RADEON/AIGLX/DRM Problem Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:17:05 +0200 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Why: Submitter disagrees that this PR is the same as the ones cited=20 > in the Audit-Trail. No, I believe vehemens said that only PR kern/89271 didn't apply, not that both didn't apply. PR kern/112984 is indeed about the very same bug, yet this PR (kern/114688) provides a much better analysis of the problem. It explains why the "fix" provided in kern/112984 is likely inadequate. Note that the "fix" supposed in kern/112984 is just patches by vehemens, who also opened this issue, ported blindly to FreeBSD 6.2 by myself hoping that it would work. But it didn't. So I'd favour this issue over kern/112984, because it has more valuable information. Maybe they should me merged? Is this possible at all with GNATS? I'd really like to see this fixed, but I have no clue about the subsystems involved either. Without knowing how these subsystems are supposed to interact by design it's almost impossible to come up with "the proper" fix. vehemens, are you still actively trying to find a fix for this issue? --=20 stefan http://stsp.name PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGoIuh5dMCc/WdJfARAkMmAJ4pJ92zE51RBn5NkaG4kQo+TMTsjQCgyIkp w5lBkXNO4eHntOkdpmCzEfw= =4tC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--