From owner-freebsd-mobile  Sun Aug  8 17:46:28 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 29D8914BFC; Sun,  8 Aug 1999 17:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (isdnb09.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.137])
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-tasogare/smtpfeed 1.01) with ESMTP id JAA18560;
	Mon, 9 Aug 1999 09:44:38 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <199908090044.JAA18560@tasogare.imasy.or.jp>
To: imp@village.org
Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, sanpei@sanpei.org,
	iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [APM] kernel panic with apm command(Sotec WinBookPro). 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:17:18 -0600"
	<199908090017.SAA02508@harmony.village.org>
References: <199908090017.SAA02508@harmony.village.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 09:48:25 +0900
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100)
Lines: 6
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> which should return be EINVAL.  ENOSYS is returned only when the
> system call itself isn't implemented.  Since ioctl is implemented on
> FreeBSD, returning it would be inappropriate.

OK, I'll correct it.
I was just charmed by the message `Function not implemented' :-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message