From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Sep 8 23: 6:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A63737B422 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 23:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id IAA29993; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:02:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA63390; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:02:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:02:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Warner Losh Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build tools as separate distribution In-Reply-To: <200009071619.e87GJEG16236@billy-club.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > : On the note of shrinking stuff, I am wondering what, if anything, came of > : the previous discussion regarding the introduction of BUILD_TINY or > : similar defines? > What would these do? My intention, which others had voiced as well, was to try to agree upon a define to add which would cut down various parts of the system to minimal functional sets. For example, one could build sh with this defined, and a number of functions would suddenly not get built into it. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message