Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:59:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Rene Ladan <rene@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/x11-wm Makefile ports/x11-wm/xfce Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-wm/xfce/files patch-ltmain.sh patch-other::xinitrc.in patch-xfce::taskbar.c Message-ID: <20120203015920.GA66683@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2B08B3.8060204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202021607.q12G7Q1i070404@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120202163919.GA95614@FreeBSD.org> <4F2B08B3.8060204@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 02:05:39PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/02/2012 08:39, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:07:26PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> rene 2012-02-02 16:07:26 UTC > >> > >> Log: > >> Remove expired port: > >> 2012-02-01 x11-wm/xfce: abandoned upstream, use x11-wm/xfce4 instead > > > > Perhaps it makes sense to move x11-wm/xfce4 -> x11-wm/xfce now? > > No, please don't do that. These moves are *very* disruptive to users, > especially when you're trying to update ports on a system that hasn't > been updated in a while. Sure, I am not strongly advocating for it, just asking. Perhaps if pkgng will allow "shallow" port moves (i.e. updating only package information under /var/pkg/db) there'll be less worries. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120203015920.GA66683>